Procurement - Interactive screens, 2026 (2)

Procédure

Procédure ouverte - tout opérateur économique peut soumissionner

Déposez votre offre sur

https://hyyr.no/procurement/cmucb8guh002j04ichitksesy

Langue de l’offre

NOR, ENG

Soumission électronique

Obligatoire

Dossier de consultation

Librement accessible

Critères d’attribution

Climate and environment, Quality, Price

Comment l’attribution est décidée

The calculated energy use and extended product lifetime for the offered monitors will be assessed under the criteria. Energy use is assessed on the basis of the stated effect values and the calculation assumptions under the sub-criteria. Weighting The award criteria climate and environment is weighted 30%. The award criteria consists of the following sub-criteria: Sub-criteria - Weight within climate and the environment: Energy use 40 % Extended lifetime 60 % Response to the tender: The information shall be given for each product line and applies to the exact manufacturer, model and SKU/article number stated in the product overview. When submitting the tender offer, the tenderer confirms that the provided environment information is correct and can be documented. The stated values, periods and other obligations are binding for the tenderer. Tenderers shall not enclose certificates, test reports, product data sheets or manufacturer confirmations together with the tender, unless expressly requested. Before the award and in the contract period, the contracting authority can request certificates, test reports, manufacturer confirmations or other relevant documentation. The tenderer shall present the requested documentation within five working days. The documentation shall confirm the information that was available at the tender deadline. Tenderers cannot, through later documentation, change or improve the information in the tender. If an information cannot be documented, it will not give a pay-out in the evaluation. Significant incorrect or misleading information can have consequences for the tender or will be seen as a breach if the relationship is uncovered in the contract period. Information and obligations paid out under the award criterion climate and environment shall be maintained throughout the offered period and in the event of product changes. Evaluation The score for each sub-criteria is calculated according to the method stated below. The score will be multiplied by the internal weight of the sub-criteria. The weighted scores will be summed up to the tender's total environmental points. The combined environment points will then be multiplied by the award criterion ́s weight of 30%., The criterium consists of the following sub-criteria: Sub-criteria - Weight within quality: User friendliness and functionality 70 % Administration, integration and operational control 30 % Response to the tender: Tenderers shall submit a separate reply in PDF format for each sub-criterium. Information on functions, licences, services and systems in the quality response is binding for the tenderer in the contract period. The following form requirements apply: font size of at least 11 A4 format and margins of at least 2 cm. Line spacing of at least 1.0 The stated page restrictions include text, tables, shapes, screen images, front pages and table of contents. Pages beyond the stated limitation will not be evaluated. Product data sheets and other documentation that is delivered separately according to requirements elsewhere in the competition documents, are not included in the page limitation. Such documentation shall only be used to substantiate information in the response and will not be evaluated as an independent response. Evaluation: Each sub-criterium will be assessed on the basis of the tenderer ́s response and the documentation referred to. Points will be given on a scale from 0 to 10. The score expresses to what degree the offered system provides documented and relevant added value for the contracting authority beyond the minimum requirements: Points Guiding Level 10 Outstanding solution with a very large relevant added value. 8 Very good solution with great relevant added value. 6 Good system with a clearly relevant excess value. 4. A system with a somewhat relevant excess value. 2. A system with little relevant added value. 0 No documented relevant excess value beyond the minimum requirements. Intermediate points can be given. The level descriptions are a guideline and the points will be based on a combined assessment of the evaluation monuments that are given under each sub-criteria. General product claims without sufficient explanation or documentation will be given little or no weight. The score for each sub-criteria will be multiplied by the internal weight of the sub-criteria. The weighted scores will be summed up to the tenderer's overall Quality Score. The combined Quality Score will then be multiplied by the quality criterion ́s weight of 35%., The total evaluated price is assessed under the criteria, calculated on the basis of the tenderer's completed digital price form and the stated evaluation amounts. The prices shall be stated in NOK excl. VAT. The costs included in the tender documentation shall be included in the relevant price items. Price points are calculated according to the hybrid model stated for the competition.

Type de marché

Fournitures

Lieu d’exécution

NO0A3

Durée

48 mois

Votre offre doit rester valable

60 jours

Accord-cadre

Oui, sans remise en concurrence

Système d’acquisition dynamique

Non

Financé par l’UE

Non

E-mail

postmottak@alesund.kommune.no, post@sande.kommune.no, torstein.saetre@sykkylven.kommune.no, ann.kristin.thu@giske.kommune.no, postmottak@volda.kommune.no, postmottak@haram.kommune.no, ragnhild.gjelsvik.varmo@orsta.kommune.no, post@sula.kommune.no

Téléphone

+4770162000, 70026700, +4790812674, +4740221130, 70058700, +4770207500, +4797608906, +47 70199100

Adresse

Keiser Wilhelms gate 11, 6003, Ålesund

Point de contact

Ålesund kommune, Sande kommune, Sykkylven kommune, Giske kommune, Volda kommune, Haram kommune, Ørsta kommune, Sula kommune